HOME     ABOUT BOB     ISSUES     GET INVOLVED     NEWS     CITIZEN RESOURCES

EASE TRAFFIC

Runaway growth has resulted in increased congestion and inadequate roads. To get a handle on our traffic problems, we must manage growth.  No more development without adequate roads.

The Cavalier Record.

·        No leadership on tackling traffic and road issues.

·        Supported road projects to facilitate more development.

The Woodson Alternative.

ü  Reject new development without adequate roads.

ü  Prioritize road projects to address congestion, not to facilitate further growth.

The Details

Traffic and congestion are increasing in Griffis-Widewater and elsewhere.

If you think you’re sitting longer in traffic, you’re correct. The annual average daily traffic count at the intersection of Route 1 and 610 (Garrisonville Road) increased 26% in just five years, from an average of 19,000 vehicles daily in 2001 to an average of 24,000 vehicles daily in 2006.[1]

Increase in Traffic, 2001-2006

Intersection

2001 Annual Average Daily Traffic

2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic

Number Increase

Percent Increase

Garrisonville ramp onto 95

           49,000

            53,000

       4,000

8%

Decatur Rd at Widewater Rd

                990

              1,500

          510

52%

Widewater Rd at Telegraph Rd

             2,900

              3,200

          300

10%

Onville Rd at Garrisonville Rd

             7,000

              8,100

       1,100

16%

Barrett Heights Rd at Garrisonville Rd

             1,700

              1,900

          200

12%

Doc Stone Rd at Garrisonville Rd

             1,500

              4,200

       2,700

180%

While residents of Griffis-Widewater await relief, County resources go to projects that facilitate more development.

Runaway growth has created a traffic nightmare on many of our roads. Yet instead of finding ways to make developers pay for traffic impacts, Jack Cavalier has voted to use taxpayer dollars to finance road projects that will facilitate development. For example, he voted:

·        To spend $6.5 million[2] to “reconstruct” Courthouse Road east of 95, even though there were fewer than 3,500 vehicle trips a day on that section of the road.[3] With improvements, a new development has popped up at the end of the new road, and more are on the way.

·        To spend another $6.8 million to reconstruct a bridge at the end of Courthouse Road [4]—a bridge that is needed so that developers can get heavy construction machinery to waterfront property along Aquia Creek.

The Woodson Alternative

No more development without adequate roads.

ü  Reject any development projects that do not have an adequate road infrastructure, both at the site entrance and at nearby traffic intersections;

ü  Allocate scarce road improvement dollars to road projects that are needed by residents, not by developers;

ü  Link land use planning and ordinances to transportation, so that decisions about growth and development take into full account potential traffic impacts.

ü  Objectively identify road improvement priorities based on average daily traffic counts and accident statistics.


[1] Based on data from VDOT 2001 and 2006 Daily Traffic Volume Estimate for Stafford County .

[2] VDOT Six year Improvement Plan, 2007

[3] VDOT 2005 Daily Traffic Volume Estimates for Stafford County .

[4] VDOT Six Year Improvement Plan, 2007