|
The
Details
In the last eight
years, since the current Griffis-Widewater Supervisor took office, the
average tax bill for homeowners has increased 66%.
Countywide, homeowners
on average now pay nearly $1,000 more per year in property taxes than they
did eight years ago. The tax bill increases have been higher in some
neighborhoods than others.
|
Neighborhood
|
Average
Tax Bill 1999
|
Average
Tax Bill 2007
|
Average
Increase in Tax Bill,
1999-2007
|
Percent
Increase in Tax Bill,
1999-2007
|
|
Aquia
Harbour
|
$1,695
|
$2,817
|
$1,122
|
66%
|
|
Brentwood
Estates
|
$1,963
|
$2,824
|
$861
|
44%
|
|
Devon
Green
|
$1,524
|
$2,760
|
$1,235
|
81%
|
|
King
James
Village
|
$1,079
|
$1,592
|
$514
|
48%
|
|
Stafford
Mews
|
$1,051
|
$1,970
|
$919
|
87%
|
|
Stonebridge at
Widewater
|
$1,593
|
$2,561
|
$967
|
61%
|
Find
out the tax bill increase in your neighborhood....
If the current
Griffis-Widewater Supervisor had his way, our property taxes would have
been even higher!
Jack Cavalier has
always led the charge for higher property taxes. For example:
·
In 2002 he voted against tax
rates of $1.10 and $1.14 and voted for a higher tax rate of $1.16
per hundred dollars of assessed value.
·
In 2004, he voted against a
tax rate of 97 cents and voted for a higher a tax rate of $1.04.
·
In 2006, as Chair of the
Board, he led the vote for an 11% property tax increase,
one of the largest single year increases ever!
In part, those
increases in property taxes paid for more services, more expensive
services, and pet projects.
Stafford
County per Person Spending, 1999-2006
Since Jack Cavalier
took office:
·
County spending increased
170%, from $106 million in 1999 to $285 million in 2006[5].
·
The increase in spending was
not due just to more people. Per person spending increased 112%
during the same period, from $1,122 per person in 1999 to $2,381 per person
in 2006[6].
·
He supported a $285 million
bond package that would have raised property taxes to pay for, among other
things, a $35 million indoor pool and a $7 million gymnastics center.oters rejected the proposal.
·
He voted to give a private
organization, the YMCA, an annual subsidy of $218,000 in taxpayer dollars
for 20 years—for a total payment of $4.4 million,
so that the YMCA could construct an indoor pool. He voted for this even
though the YMCA reported earning $10 million a year in profit and fund
balances of $16 million,
and the Board had already subsidized the YMCA construction by leasing land
to it for $1 per year for 99 years.
The “Y” is a valuable community asset, but taxpayers should not
be bankrolling a private organization.
The County is
living beyond its means. Year after year, the developer majority on the
Board of Supervisors votes to spend more than the County receives in
revenue, thus increasing the County’s debt load every year.
·
County debt doubled, from
$155 million in 1999 to $337 million in 2006.
·
Debt service
increased from $14 million a year in 1999 to $28 million a year in
2006. In
1999, the principal and interest on debt was $150 per person. By 2006, it increased to
$236 per person.
·
The County’s financial
consultant has warned the Board that its reliance on property taxes and
debt could lead to a possible downgrading of the County’s bond rating.
The
Woodson Alternative
It’s time for
developers to pay their fair share so that homeowners pay a smaller share.
Control property
taxes by doing the following:
ü
Update the base amount of
developer proffers on an annual basis using actual capital expenditures,
to ensure that proffers reflect the true costs of development;
ü
Create staff positions to
analyze the financial, traffic and school impacts of development projects,
instead of allowing developers to do this;
ü
Restructure our fee and tax
system so that developers and big business pay their fair share;
ü
Vote against allowing
developers to subtract from proffers cash spent on amenities and traffic
improvements that primarily serve the new development;
ü
Practice fiscal
accountability and eliminating pork projects from the budget; and
ü
Manage growth
to manage
County
expenditures.
|