HOME     ABOUT BOB     ISSUES     GET INVOLVED     NEWS     CITIZEN RESOURCES

Woodson Opposes TND;
Pledges New Leadership for Real Smart Growth

Bob Woodson opposed the “Traditional Neighborhood Development” ordinance written to accommodate large development projects.  Instead, he favors a plan for real smart growth that protects citizens, not special interests. 

On July 11, the Free-Lance Star published an op-ed Woodson had co-written (with Harry Crisp and Jerry Kirven, running for Supervisor from the George Washington and Rock Hill Districts) outlining the elements of a comprehensive strategy to manage growth, protect taxpayers, and guard our natural resources.  The candidates challenged their opponents to sign on to such an approach; they declined.


(L to R) Harry Crisp (George Washington District), Jerry Kirven (Rock Hill District), and Bob Woodson (Griffis-Widewater) stand by a plan that provides "New Leadership for Real 'Smart Growth.'"

On July 17, when the Board of Supervisors considered the TND ordinance, Woodson and his colleagues reaffirmed their commitment to this comprehensive strategy, publicly signing their proposal’s key provisions during a press conference held before the Supervisors meeting.  During the Board meetings’ public comment period, Woodson again highlighted some of the many reasons why the ordinance was terrible legislation, including the impact it could have on residents of Aquia Harbour and the rest of the Griffis-Widewater district.  The ordinance will make runaway growth worse, will result in higher taxes for everyone, and will do nothing to combat sprawl or protect our natural resources.  The ordinance was written to accommodate projects developers are already promoting and was advanced without adequate citizen input.

Bob Woodson,
from his comments to the Board of Supervisors

During the public comment period, the TND generated intense opposition from citizens, while developers and their supporters acknowledged numerous problems with the legislation but urged that it be passed anyway. 

Once again, the Board of Supervisors followed the developers’ recommendations.  Board members Brito (I), Fields (D), and Scwhartz (D) opposed the legislation, voting to reject the TND as written in favor of creating a mixed-use ordinance in the context of the County’s Comprehensive Plan with extensive citizen input.  Board members Dudenheffer (R), Gibbons (R), and Milde (R), had long sided with big developers and their TND plan.  Jack Cavalier (I) became the decisive vote and joined the majority in supporting the developer-initiated plan despite the objections of citizens.  Acknowledging they were passing a bad piece of legislation, the Board attached a provision to their vote that the ordinance go back to the Planning Commission for review.  This maneuver gave the impression of taking into account a few of the many citizens’ objections, while leaving developers free to initiate new TND projects under the bad piece of legislation the Board had already passed.

This entire process epitomizes what has been wrong with Stafford County’s approach to growth.  Instead of considering citizen well-being, the developers have been able to dictate the County’s policies.  The result has been runaway growth with all its accompanying problems.  Until the Board has a majority that is willing to speak on behalf of citizens, not special interests, we can expect the growth-related problems in Stafford to only get worse.

 

Related Media Stories